On 19.12.2017 13:20, Qu Wenruo wrote: > Naming like pad1/2 will make the check in btrfs_qgroup_inherit() look > quite weird. > > Although I don't have any better idea, so I'm mostly fine with such rename.
Right, I saw the check now, missed it the first time. I think we should remove it and the code should completely ignore these values. Ideally, we would have removed them from qgroup_inherit struct as well but this means breaking the on-disk format. So let's ignore them altogether. > > Thanks, -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
