On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:13:38PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:50:48PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > I have more comments or maybe questions about the future development > > workflow, but at this point the patchset is in a good shape for > > incremental merge. > > After removnig the first patch adding subvolume.c (with > linux/btrfs_tree.h) and what depends on it, I'm left with: > > Omar Sandoval (4): > Add libbtrfsutil > libbtrfsutil: add Python bindings > libbtrfsutil: add qgroup inheritance helpers > libbtrfsutil: add filesystem sync helpers > > with some context updates. That builds and passes the CI tests.
Great. Does the CI system run the Python tests yet? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
