On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 10:50:32AM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 04:13:38PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 07:50:48PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > > > I have more comments or maybe questions about the future development > > > workflow, but at this point the patchset is in a good shape for > > > incremental merge. > > > > After removnig the first patch adding subvolume.c (with > > linux/btrfs_tree.h) and what depends on it, I'm left with: > > > > Omar Sandoval (4): > > Add libbtrfsutil > > libbtrfsutil: add Python bindings > > libbtrfsutil: add qgroup inheritance helpers > > libbtrfsutil: add filesystem sync helpers > > > > with some context updates. That builds and passes the CI tests. > > Great. Does the CI system run the Python tests yet?
Tested here https://travis-ci.org/kdave/btrfs-progs/jobs/345410536 , does not pass. test_start_sync (test_filesystem.TestSubvolume) ... mkfs.btrfs: invalid option -- 'q' usage: mkfs.btrfs [options] dev [ dev ... ] Looks like it tries to use the system mkfs.btrfs that is old. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
