On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:13:28PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > This is the fourth (and hopefully final) version of the orphan item > early ENOSPC and related fixes. > > Changes since v3: > > - Changed another stale comment in patch 1 > - Moved BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED flag removal to patch 10 > instead of patch 9 > - Moved inode runtime flag renumbering to a separate patch (patch 11) > - Added some more reviewed-bys
Patchset added to misc-next, thanks. Besides fstests, I've hammered it with some stress testing, all fine. > Changes since v2: > > - Add patch 5 to get rid of BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM > - Move patch 10 to patch 6 > - Got rid of patch 5; the bug goes away in the process of removing code > for patches 9 and 10 > - Rename patch 10 batch to what it was called in v1 > > Changes since v1: > > - Added two extra cleanups, patches 10 and 11 > - Added a forgotten clear of the orphan bit in patch 8 > - Reworded titles of patches 6 and 9 > - Added people's reviewed-bys > > Cover letter from v1: > > At Facebook we hit an early ENOSPC issue which we tracked down to the > reservations for orphan items of deleted-but-still-open files. The > primary function of this series is to fix that bug, but I ended up > uncovering a pile of other issues in the process, most notably that the > orphan items we create for truncate are useless. > > I've also posted an xfstest that reproduces this bug. > > Thanks! > > *** BLURB HERE *** Blurb! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
