On 19.07.2018 17:49, Josef Bacik wrote:
> For enospc_debug having the block rsvs is super helpful to see if we've
> done something wrong.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index 6de9a180abdd..35c1c1b7ba1d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -8050,6 +8050,15 @@ static noinline int find_free_extent(struct 
> btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void dump_block_rsv(struct btrfs_block_rsv *rsv)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&rsv->lock);
> +     printk(KERN_ERR "%d: size %llu reserved %llu\n",
> +            rsv->type, (unsigned long long)rsv->size,
> +            (unsigned long long)rsv->reserved);

Why do you cast to unsigned long long given that size/reserved are
already defined as u64? Also use pr_err rather than printk.

> +     spin_unlock(&rsv->lock);
> +}
> +
>  static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>                           struct btrfs_space_info *info, u64 bytes,
>                           int dump_block_groups)
> @@ -8069,6 +8078,12 @@ static void dump_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info 
> *fs_info,
>               info->bytes_readonly);
>       spin_unlock(&info->lock);
>  
> +     dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->global_block_rsv);
> +     dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->trans_block_rsv);
> +     dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->chunk_block_rsv);
> +     dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->delayed_block_rsv);
> +     dump_block_rsv(&fs_info->delayed_refs_rsv);
> +
>       if (!dump_block_groups)
>               return;
>  
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to