On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 06:35:33PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 19.07.2018 17:49, Josef Bacik wrote: > > If we're allocating a new space cache inode it's likely going to be > > under a transaction handle, so we need to use GFP_NOFS to keep from > > deadlocking. Otherwise GFP_KERNEL is fine. > > > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jo...@toxicpanda.com> > > --- > > fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 5 +++++ > > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 ++- > > fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > > index d5f80cb300be..13bc514e4e16 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c > > @@ -68,7 +68,12 @@ static struct inode *__lookup_free_space_inode(struct > > btrfs_root *root, > > btrfs_disk_key_to_cpu(&location, &disk_key); > > btrfs_release_path(path); > > > > + /* We need this set so that we use GFP_NOFS when allocating our inode. > > */ > > + if (current->journal_info == NULL) > > + current->journal_info = BTRFS_TRANS_STUB; > > inode = btrfs_iget(fs_info->sb, &location, root, NULL); > > + if (current->journal_info == BTRFS_TRANS_STUB) > > + current->journal_info = NULL; > This is not safe in the face of stacked filesystem, i.e ext4 uses the > journal_info. > > > if (IS_ERR(inode)) > > return inode; > > if (is_bad_inode(inode)) { > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > index eba61bcb9bb3..14ecfe5d6110 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > @@ -9211,8 +9211,9 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block > > *sb) > > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = btrfs_sb(sb); > > struct btrfs_inode *ei; > > struct inode *inode; > > + gfp_t flags = (current->journal_info) ? GFP_NOFS : GFP_KERNEL; > > > > - ei = kmem_cache_alloc(btrfs_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL); > > + ei = kmem_cache_alloc(btrfs_inode_cachep, flags); > > Why don't you just hardcode GFP_NOFS? We should be striving at removing > abuse of ->journal_info than proliferating it.
We're also removing unnecessary use of GFP_NOFS. The right way here is to use memalloc_nofs_save/memalloc_nofs_restore around btrfs_iget. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html