On 2018/10/11 下午8:31, David Sterba wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:49:49PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> We have btrfs_super_block::log_root_transid to record the transid of log
>> tree root.
>>
>> However it's never populated and it's always 0, just as the following
>> dump-super:
>>  log_root                30572544
>>  log_root_transid        0
>>  log_root_level          0
>>
>> This patch will populate it with log tree root correctly, so the result
>> will be:
>>  log_root                30572544
>>  log_root_transid        6
>>  log_root_level          0
>>
>> This won't affect current kernel behavior or btrfs check result as we
>> already expect log tree root generation always to be super block
>> genration + 1.
>>
>> But it could be later used to detect log tree corruption early.
> 
> The backward compatibility seems to be ok in general, I found one
> scenario where the check will fail:
> 
> * mount with unpatched kernel, log_root_transid = 0
> * mount with patched kernel, log_root_transid 100, generation 101
> * mount with unpatched kernel, log_root_transid 100 (unchanged), generation 
> 201
> * mount with patched kernel -> check fails

Indeed, this is a problem I missed.

It provides the old principle, if we're going to change how kernel
use/interprete a on-disk memeber, we have to introduce a new
incompatible flag.

Please just drop the series of patch.

Thanks,
Qu
> 
> So the problem is when log_root_transid is not 0 and changes out of sync
> with the generation. The above sequence of kernels can simply happen
> when switching between old stable and current releases.
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to