On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> 
> The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it
> needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer.  Change it to
> run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to
> cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to
> unify the extent op handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct 
> btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref
>       btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head);
>  }
>  
> -static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> -                          struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
> +static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *
> +cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> +               struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)

Please keep the type and function name on one line, if the arguments
would overflow, then move it on the next line and un-indent as
necessary. I fix such things when merging, no need to resend.

>  {
>       struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op;
> -     int ret;
>  
>       if (!extent_op)
> -             return 0;
> -     head->extent_op = NULL;
> +             return NULL;
> +
>       if (head->must_insert_reserved) {
> +             head->extent_op = NULL;
>               btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op);
> -             return 0;
> +             return NULL;
>       }
> +     return extent_op;
> +}
> +
> +static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> +                                  struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
> +{
> +     struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op =
> +             cleanup_extent_op(trans, head);

I prefer to do non-trivial initializations in the statement block, it's
easy to overlook that in among the declarations. Simple variable init,
pointer dereferenes or using simple helpers is fine but cleanup_extent_op
does not seem to fit to that. It's in other patches too so I can update
that unless there are other things that would need a resend.

Reply via email to