On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 01:59:09PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > From: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com> > > The cleanup_extent_op function actually would run the extent_op if it > needed running, which made the name sort of a misnomer. Change it to > run_and_cleanup_extent_op, and move the actual cleanup work to > cleanup_extent_op so it can be used by check_ref_cleanup() in order to > unify the extent op handling. > > Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jba...@fb.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > index e3ed3507018d..8a776dc9cb38 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c > @@ -2424,19 +2424,33 @@ static void unselect_delayed_ref_head(struct > btrfs_delayed_ref_root *delayed_ref > btrfs_delayed_ref_unlock(head); > } > > -static int cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > - struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +static struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op * > +cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head)
Please keep the type and function name on one line, if the arguments would overflow, then move it on the next line and un-indent as necessary. I fix such things when merging, no need to resend. > { > struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = head->extent_op; > - int ret; > > if (!extent_op) > - return 0; > - head->extent_op = NULL; > + return NULL; > + > if (head->must_insert_reserved) { > + head->extent_op = NULL; > btrfs_free_delayed_extent_op(extent_op); > - return 0; > + return NULL; > } > + return extent_op; > +} > + > +static int run_and_cleanup_extent_op(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > + struct btrfs_delayed_ref_head *head) > +{ > + struct btrfs_delayed_extent_op *extent_op = > + cleanup_extent_op(trans, head); I prefer to do non-trivial initializations in the statement block, it's easy to overlook that in among the declarations. Simple variable init, pointer dereferenes or using simple helpers is fine but cleanup_extent_op does not seem to fit to that. It's in other patches too so I can update that unless there are other things that would need a resend.