在 2023/3/28 22:19, David Howells 写道:
Jia Zhu <zhujia...@bytedance.com> wrote:

+               if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
+                       xa_lock(xa);
+                       xa_for_each_marked(xa, index, req, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
+                               if 
(!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
+                                       mask |= EPOLLIN;
+                                       break;
+                               }
+                       }
+                       xa_unlock(xa);
+               }

I wonder if there's a more efficient way to do this.  I guess it depends on
how many reqs you expect to get in a queue.  It might be worth taking the
rcu_read_lock before calling xa_lock() and holding it over the whole loop.

Thanks for the advice, will use rcu_read_lock(unlock) to replace it.
David


--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs

Reply via email to