在 2023/3/28 22:19, David Howells 写道:
Jia Zhu <zhujia...@bytedance.com> wrote:
+ if (!xa_empty(xa)) {
+ xa_lock(xa);
+ xa_for_each_marked(xa, index, req, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW) {
+ if
(!cachefiles_ondemand_is_reopening_read(req)) {
+ mask |= EPOLLIN;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ xa_unlock(xa);
+ }
I wonder if there's a more efficient way to do this. I guess it depends on
how many reqs you expect to get in a queue. It might be worth taking the
rcu_read_lock before calling xa_lock() and holding it over the whole loop.
Thanks for the advice, will use rcu_read_lock(unlock) to replace it.
David
--
Linux-cachefs mailing list
Linux-cachefs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-cachefs