On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Jared Buckley wrote:
Sorry for the late response;
> Recertification Consensus:
>
> LPI will not require certificate holders to renew or recertify. LPI
> will keep records of the test(s) passed and the revision date/level(s)
> of the passed test(s). LPI will adopt a written policy advisory policy
> encouraging certificate holders to recertify in these areas where their
> certification is more than two years old.
This is somewhat arbitrary, but OK. I saw that this is sufficiently
vague however that it is cause for vultures to sue the marrow out of your
bones. Sheesh, how can you americans do ANY business in such a legal
environment?
> Exam Renewal Consensus:
>
> In order to provide for security, test validity, new material, and to
> incorporate feedback from experience, LPI will update each exam on a two
> year interval.
Is this the consensus of the discussions? I thought that we more tended
towards renewing when WE find it necessary, and not be forced by a fixed
term or the marketing-driven upgrade policy of the distributions. As
Scott pointed out, we probably will be reviewing the objectives and the
exams more frequently.
--
#>!$!%(@^%#%*(&(#@#*$^@^$##*#@&(%)@**$!(&!^(#((#&%!)%*@)(&$($$%(@#)&*!^$)^@*^@)
Tom "thriving on chaos" Peters
NL-1062 KD nr 149 tel. 31-204080204
Amsterdam e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________
This message was sent by the linux-cert-program mailing list. To unsubscribe:
echo unsubscribe | mail -s '' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
