On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:31:15 -0500 Steve French <[email protected]> wrote:
> With the proposed cifs.ko fix to honor maxmpx, cifs_max_pending > because a limit when the server (as Windows often is) has more than 50 > maxmpxct in its registry. Does anyone mind if I update the maximum > to one or two hundred? (after the mpx fix is in)? > Ummm...what proposed fix? I've not seen that patch cross the list. Did I miss it? > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> > > --- > > fs/cifs/cifsfs.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c > > index b0a2e16..fa67245 100644 > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c > > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ module_param(cifs_min_small, int, 0); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_min_small, "Small network buffers in pool. Default: > > 30 " > > "Range: 2 to 256"); > > unsigned int cifs_max_pending = CIFS_MAX_REQ; > > -module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0); > > +module_param(cifs_max_pending, int, 0444); > > MODULE_PARM_DESC(cifs_max_pending, "Simultaneous requests to server. " > > "Default: 50 Range: 2 to 256"); > > unsigned short echo_retries = 5; > > -- > > 1.7.6.4 > > > > > > > -- Jeff Layton <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
