On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:32:47 -0500 Steve French <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Jeff Layton <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:31:15 -0500 > > Steve French <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> With the proposed cifs.ko fix to honor maxmpx, cifs_max_pending > >> because a limit when the server (as Windows often is) has more than 50 > >> maxmpxct in its registry. Does anyone mind if I update the maximum > >> to one or two hundred? (after the mpx fix is in)? > >> > > > > Ummm...what proposed fix? I've not seen that patch cross the list. Did > > I miss it? > > well ... you asked me to rename one of the flags so I am pretty sure you saw > it. I plan to repost it - although it is a little less important now > that we realize > that the Windows problem can occur even when mpx is 50 (still it is good > to honor the server limit). > Ahh ok. That wasn't sent to the list so I didn't know you were "officially" proposing that patch. I'd suggest you do so to ensure that others who weren't on the cc list have a chance to review it. -- Jeff Layton <[email protected]> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
