On Do, 2014-07-17 at 05:18 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> SYNOPSIS
>       #include <linux/random.h>
> 
>       int getrandom(void *buf, size_t buflen, unsigned int flags);

Cool, I think the interface is sane.

Btw. couldn't libressl etc. fall back to binary_sysctl
kernel.random.uuid and seed with that as a last resort? We have it
available for few more years.

> +SYSCALL_DEFINE3(getrandom, char __user *, buf, size_t, count,
> +             unsigned int, flags)
> +{
> +     int r;
> +
> +     if (count > 256)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +

Why this "arbitrary" limitation? Couldn't we just check for > SSIZE_MAX
or to be more conservative to INT_MAX?

> +     if (flags & GRND_RANDOM) {
> +             return _random_read(!(flags & GRND_BLOCK), buf, count);
> +     }
> +     if (flags & GRND_BLOCK) {
> +             r = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&urandom_initialized);
> +             if (r)
> +                     return r;
> +     } else if (!completion_done(&urandom_initialized))
> +             return -EAGAIN;
> +     return urandom_read(NULL, buf, count, NULL);
> +}
> +

Great, thanks Ted,
Hannes



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to