Jason A. Donenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Still not really sure what the point is. There's only one user of > > > crypto_sig, and it could just call the ML-DSA functions directly. > > > > Is it your aim to kill off the crypto/ dir and all the (old) crypto API? > > Probably entirely killing off the old API is going to be fraught > because its abstraction has leaked out to userspace. But to the extent > we can minimize its use over time, I think that's a good thing. Even > for crypto usages that generalize to a few different ciphers of one > variety or another, I think being explicit about which ciphers and > having purpose-built dispatchers is usually a better route.
How are you proposing handling the autoloading feature of the old API? David
