I had a similar problem: I could do everything I wanted with the Linux
machine but nothing with the M$-clients. This problem only occured when
I was using diald to get the link up. When I established the link by hand
(directly with ppp) the clients had no problem. After long hours of trial,
upgrading diald, ppp, ipfwadm, etc. blabla, I found that removing the
option  "strict-forwarding" from my diald.conf did the trick. I have a
dynamic IP address and as far as I can remeber this option was in because
I somewhere read "If you have a dynamic IP address you almost certainly
want this". Anyhow since I've throun this out everything works fine and
I did not see any bad influence of having this option not in anymore.

> 
> I�m still having probs getting IP masquerading run with diald. I�m using
> RedHat 5.2, diald 0.16.5a-1 via ppp0 and 33.6 modem. I set up IP maqs
> this way:
> 
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
> 
> /sbin/ipfwadm -F -f
> 
> /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny -v
> /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m  -S 192.168.0.0/16 -D 0.0.0.0/0 -o -v

looks okay, mine is:

/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0

> 
> Diald calls out as expected and the gateway can do everything on the
> internet.
> 
> When I�m using my second PC to communicate via the gateway running linux
> I can ftp to the internet with no prob,  but using M$ windoze NT 4.0
> doesn�t work.
> Another strange point is when issuing the command ipfwadm -M -ln and NT
                                                                 ^
                                                                 ^
what do you mean with that ? I think this is syntacticly wrong. Try
ipfwadm -M -l

> tried to connect to a internet ftp site I get:
> 
> IP masquerading entries
> ipfwadm: unexpected input data
> Try `ipfwadm -h' for more information.
> 
> The gateway does have 2 10base T nics and masquerading between these
> interfaces (eth0, eth1) just works fine, but with ppp0 it doesn�t.
> The gateways ip addresses are 192.168.1.1 eth0, 192.168.2.1 eth1. The NT
> has 192.168.1.2.
> 
> If anyone has such a configuration running please let me know!
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Sandro
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to