On Fri, 6 Nov 1998, Marvin George wrote:
> For over 9 months, we have successfully used Linux (RH 5.0) with diald
> and IP masquerading to put our LAN on the Internet. Our former ISP used
> a version of Unix (unknown which one). We recently switched to a
> different ISP who uses (UGH!!!) NT. The dynamically assigned local IP
> is not present in the output of ifconfig -- it is using the same IP as
> the ethernet card, which is from the private set of network numbers
> (192.168.1.x). When I log on using dip, it works correctly, assigning
> the dynamic IP to the local (ppp0) interface. With both dip and diald,
> the remote IP is correctly assigned.
So what's the problem?
> Also, when logging on with dip, IP masquerading does not work.
Odd. Where is your IP masquerading set up? Please post your
configuration files, output from ifconfig, ipfwadm, etc. so we can see the
details.
> Any ideas about what I might need to change for either diald or IP
> masquerading?
Umm ... switch to an ISP that uses Unix? :-)
Ed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
