Yeah, this is a problem that needs fixing. The 2.0.xx kernels define
AF_NETLINK even though they don't actually support it.
The temporary, and easy, solution is to #undef AF_NETLINK just before
any lines that say #ifdef AF_NETLINK in the two files proxy_tap.c and
proxy.c; make clean;make ...
-Gyepi
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 10:38:10AM +0100, Simon Burley wrote:
> OK. So after finding out that there are newer versions of diald then I
> was aware of (0.16 > 0.99.1) I went ahead and downloaded and again tried
> to compile on my sparc 2.0.35
>
> I now get:
>
> cc -O2 -Wall -pipe -DTCP_WRAPPERS -c proxy_tap.c -o proxy_tap.o
> proxy_tap.c:19: linux/netlink.h: No such file or directory
> proxy_tap.c: In function `proxy_tap_init':
> proxy_tap.c:123: storage size of `nl' isn't known
> proxy_tap.c:135: `SIOCGIFINDEX' undeclared (first use this function)
> proxy_tap.c:135: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> proxy_tap.c:135: for each function it appears in.)
> proxy_tap.c:139: `NETLINK_TAPBASE' undeclared (first use this function)
> proxy_tap.c:123: warning: unused variable `nl'
> make: *** [proxy_tap.o] Error 1
>
> In README, it states that 2.0.x series didn't have ethertap support, so
> am I seeing the result of this? Damn. So close....
> Thanks
> Simon
> --
> /* Simon Burley */
> /* Double Negative Limited 77 Shaftesbury Avenue London W1V 8HQ */
> /* Tel: +44 (0) 171 534 4400 ext 417 Fax: +44 (0) 171 534 4452 */
> /* Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot */
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
