[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> After spending over a week in attemps of making version 0.99.1 working on a
> basic RHL6.0 box I decided to look into the source of it. I did not get why
> did the whole thing had to be written thru SLIP. Can someone explain it to
> me?
> 

Originally this was the easiest (only!) way to get the kernel to hand
ip traffic to a user process for monitoring and forwarding.  With
the newer kernels there seem to be more options.

It is a pretty clever idea -- opening a pty and telling the
kernel it is a slip port.  You can do the same thing with pppd.
Open a pty and run pppd on the other end.  

> I've been thinking of trying to rewrite diald, maybe not with as many
> features, yet something that would be easy to install. Does anyone have any
> good ideas of how the good thing should work?
> 

Diald is a complex full-featured program.  It can be difficult to
setup and diagnose, as anyone who follows this mailing list can
attest to.  However i'm not sure a diald-lite is a good idea, expecially
since (i hear) pppd has an on-demand feature that may work for
simple configurations.

But if you want to "scratch that itch", go for it.

-- cary

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to