> What's puzzling me is why my > RH5.1(2.2.9)+pppd-2.3.7+diald-0.99.1 setup doesn't work under > RH6.1+pppd-2.3.10+diald-0.99.4. None of the doc suggests that > it wouldn't. I'm back to desperately trying anyoldthing > like 'ipcp-accept-xxxx', which I never needed before. I've > tried it with and without. Have you added 'noauth' to your pppd options? (This was caused by security changes in pppd 2.3.9+ rather than any changes in diald.) See man pppd for details. Lourdes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-diald" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- mysterious log entries: pls look! Mark Johnson
- Re: mysterious log entries: pls look! Eric W. Biederman
- Re: mysterious log entries: pls look! Mark Johnson
- demand dialling - pppd ( Was: mysterious log entrie... Shane Bearham
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( Was: mysterious lo... Dima Nemchenko
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( Was: mysteriou... Mark Johnson
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( Was: myste... Bob Chiodini
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( Was: ... Mark Johnson
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( W... Lourdes Jones
- Re: demand dialling - pppd ( Was: myste... Jan Pisacka
- Re: mysterious log entries: pls look! Tim Coleman
- Re: mysterious log entries: pls look! Mark Johnson
