Hello,

On 12/12/25 20:43, Shenwei Wang wrote:
Register the RPMsg channel driver and populate remote devices defined
under the "rpmsg" subnode upon receiving their notification messages.

The following illustrates the expected DTS layout structure:

        cm33: remoteproc-cm33 {
                compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33";

                rpmsg {
                        rpmsg-io-channel {
                                gpio@0 {
                                        compatible = "fsl,imx-rpmsg-gpio";
                                        reg = <0>;
                                };

                                gpio@1 {
                                        compatible = "fsl,imx-rpmsg-gpio";
                                        reg = <1>;
                                };

                                ...
                        };

                        ...
                };
        };

Signed-off-by: Shenwei Wang <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c   | 143 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h |  33 +++++++
  2 files changed, 176 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 include/linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
index 33f21ab24c92..65ee16fd66d1 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@
  #include <linux/module.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>
  #include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
  #include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
  #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
@@ -22,6 +24,8 @@
  #include <linux/reboot.h>
  #include <linux/regmap.h>
  #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
+#include <linux/rpmsg.h>
+#include <linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h>
  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include "imx_rproc.h"
@@ -1016,6 +1020,141 @@ static void imx_rproc_destroy_workqueue(void *data)
        destroy_workqueue(workqueue);
  }
+struct imx_rpmsg_driver {
+       struct rpmsg_driver rpdrv;
+       const char *compat;
+       void *driver_data;
+};
+
+static const char *channel_device_map[][2] = {
+       {"rpmsg-io-channel", "rpmsg-gpio"},
+};
+
+static int imx_rpmsg_endpoint_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data,
+                                int len, void *priv, u32 src)
+{
+       struct rpdev_platform_info *drvdata;
+
+       drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&rpdev->dev);
+       if (drvdata && drvdata->rx_callback)
+               return drvdata->rx_callback(rpdev, data, len, priv, src);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void imx_rpmsg_endpoint_remove(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
+{
+       of_platform_depopulate(&rpdev->dev);
+}
+
+static int imx_rpmsg_endpoint_probe(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev)
+{
+       struct rpdev_platform_info *drvdata;
+       struct imx_rpmsg_driver *imx_rpdrv;
+       struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
+       struct of_dev_auxdata *auxdata;
+       struct rpmsg_driver *rpdrv;
+
+       rpdrv = container_of(dev->driver, struct rpmsg_driver, drv);
+       imx_rpdrv = container_of(rpdrv, struct imx_rpmsg_driver, rpdrv);
+
+       if (!imx_rpdrv->driver_data)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       drvdata = devm_kmemdup(dev, imx_rpdrv->driver_data, sizeof(*drvdata), 
GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!drvdata)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       auxdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*auxdata) * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!auxdata)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       drvdata->rpdev = rpdev;
+       auxdata[0].compatible = devm_kstrdup(dev, imx_rpdrv->compat, 
GFP_KERNEL);
+       auxdata[0].platform_data = drvdata;
+       dev_set_drvdata(dev, drvdata);
+
+       of_platform_populate(drvdata->channel_node, NULL, auxdata, dev);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static const char *imx_of_rpmsg_is_in_map(const char *name)
+{
+       int i;
+
+       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(channel_device_map); i++) {
+               if (strcmp(name, channel_device_map[i][0]) == 0)
+                       return channel_device_map[i][1];
+       }
+
+       return NULL;
+}
+
+static int imx_of_rpmsg_register_rpdriver(struct device_node *channel,
+                                         struct device *dev,
+                                         const char *name,
+                                         const char *compat)
+{
+       struct rpdev_platform_info *driver_data;
+       struct imx_rpmsg_driver *rp_driver;
+       struct rpmsg_device_id *rpdev_id;
+
+       /* rpmsg_device_id is a NULL terminated array */
+       rpdev_id = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rpdev_id) * 2, GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!rpdev_id)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       strscpy(rpdev_id[0].name, name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
+
+       rp_driver = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rp_driver), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!rp_driver)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       driver_data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*driver_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!driver_data)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       driver_data->rproc_name = dev->of_node->name;
+       driver_data->channel_node = channel;
+
+       rp_driver->rpdrv.drv.name = name;
+       rp_driver->rpdrv.id_table = rpdev_id;
+       rp_driver->rpdrv.probe = imx_rpmsg_endpoint_probe;
+       rp_driver->rpdrv.remove = imx_rpmsg_endpoint_remove;
+       rp_driver->rpdrv.callback = imx_rpmsg_endpoint_cb;
+       rp_driver->driver_data = driver_data;
+       rp_driver->compat = compat;
+
+       register_rpmsg_driver(&rp_driver->rpdrv);


I still believe that creating a dependency between remoteproc and rpmsg is not suitable.

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but since you define gpio@0 and gpio@1 in your device tree, you call register_rpmsg_driver() twice, creating two instances of the same driver. To differentiate both, you fill the rpdrv.id_table with the node names "gpio@0" and "gpio@1".

In a topology with two remote processors, each needing rpmsg-gpio, the same situation would not work because you would have two "gpio@0" entries.

What about using the ns-announcement mechanism on the remote side to address GPIO port/bank instances?

In the rpmsg-gpio driver, you could define:

static struct rpmsg_device_id rpmsg_gpio_id_table[] = {
    { .name = "rpmsg-gpio" },
    { .name = "rpmsg_gpio-0" },
    { .name = "rpmsg_gpio-1" },
    { .name = "rpmsg_gpio-2" },
    { .name = "rpmsg_gpio-3" },
    { },
};

Then the match between the device tree and the rpmsg bus could be done in the rpmsg-gpio driver by matching the rpmsg name with the compatible property plus the reg value.

Example device tree snippet:

cm33: remoteproc-cm33 {
    compatible = "fsl,imx8ulp-cm33";

    rpmsg {
        rpmsg-io-channel {
            gpio@0 {
                compatible = "rpmsg_gpio";
                reg = <0>;
            };

            gpio@1 {
                compatible = "rpmsg_gpio";
                reg = <1>;
            };

            ...
        };

        ...
    };
};

With this approach, rpmsg management could be handled entirely within the rpmsg-gpio driver, avoiding the need to register multiple instances of the rpmsg_gpio driver.

Regards,
Arnaud

+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int rproc_of_rpmsg_node_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+       const char *compat;
+       int ret;
+
+       struct device_node *np __free(device_node) = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node, 
"rpmsg");
+       if (!np)
+               return 0;
+
+       for_each_child_of_node_scoped(np, child) {
+               compat = imx_of_rpmsg_is_in_map(child->name);
+               if (!compat)
+                       ret = of_platform_default_populate(child, NULL, dev);
+               else
+                       ret = imx_of_rpmsg_register_rpdriver(child, dev, 
child->name, compat);
+
+               if (ret < 0)
+                       return ret;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
  static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  {
        struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -1114,6 +1253,10 @@ static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                goto err_put_pm;
        }
+ ret = rproc_of_rpmsg_node_init(pdev);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               dev_info(dev, "populating 'rpmsg' node failed\n");
+
        return 0;
err_put_pm:
diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h b/include/linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..13e020cd028b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rpmsg/rpdev_info.h
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright 2025 NXP */
+
+/*
+ * @file linux/rpdev_info.h
+ *
+ * @brief Global header file for RPDEV Info
+ *
+ * @ingroup RPMSG
+ */
+#ifndef __LINUX_RPDEV_INFO_H__
+#define __LINUX_RPDEV_INFO_H__
+
+#define MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL    10
+
+/**
+ * rpdev_platform_info - store the platform information of rpdev
+ * @rproc_name: the name of the remote proc.
+ * @rpdev: rpmsg channel device
+ * @device_node: pointer to the device node of the rpdev.
+ * @rx_callback: rx callback handler of the rpdev.
+ * @channel_devices: an array of the devices related to the rpdev.
+ */
+struct rpdev_platform_info {
+       const char *rproc_name;
+       struct rpmsg_device *rpdev;
+       struct device_node *channel_node;
+       int (*rx_callback)(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void *data,
+                          int len, void *priv, u32 src);
+       void *channel_devices[MAX_DEV_PER_CHANNEL];
+};
+
+#endif /* __LINUX_RPDEV_INFO_H__ */


Reply via email to