On Fri, 2026-01-16 at 17:51 +0000, Nikita Kalyazin wrote: > Yes, this is a problem that we'd like to address. We have been > discussing it in [1]. The effect of flushing on memory population > that we see on x86 is 5-7x elongation. We are thinking of making use > of the no-direct-map memory allocator that Brendan is working on [2].
Ah, makes sense. Do you plan to merge this before the performance problems are addressed? I guess this series focuses on safety and functionality first.
