On 16/01/2026 18:10, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
On Fri, 2026-01-16 at 17:51 +0000, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
Yes, this is a problem that we'd like to address. We have been
discussing it in [1]. The effect of flushing on memory population
that we see on x86 is 5-7x elongation. We are thinking of making use
of the no-direct-map memory allocator that Brendan is working on [2].
Ah, makes sense.
Do you plan to merge this before the performance problems are
addressed? I guess this series focuses on safety and functionality
first.
Yes, we'd like to merge the functional part first and then optimise it
in the further series.
