Kenneth Aafløy wrote: > On Tuesday 20 July 2004 21:08, Holger Waechtler wrote: > > wouldn't it be better to replace the from-scratch list-and-device > > handling in dvb_i2c.[hc] by the driver/bus infrastructure in 2.6 that > > provides the same functionality
Holger, what exactly do you mean here? > > and to rename every dvb_i2c occurence by > > dvb_uC in order to mirror the additional flexibility of this code? > > I'm not sure anymore..does anyone else have an oppinion on this before I do > the rest of the conversions? The goal was to get sysfs support for firmware loading. And people on lkml also perceived dvb_i2c as a duplication of code from the i2c driver layer, and wanted it to be removed. Johannes
