On 2017-04-18 19:10, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 18 April 2017 at 14:46, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 18 April 2017 at 14:44, Matt Fleming <m...@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Apr, at 02:59:43PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> >>>> I've implemented this, but for the old design, and Ard took over then. >>>> So it never made it to the list. >>>> >>>> Whatever layout of these bits is preferred, it can probably be done. I >>>> just need an indication that there is (likely) a consensus. >>> >>> Post what you already have on top of Ard's series and we'll review it. >> >> For the record, other than the change Matt suggested (to take the >> Quirk handling out of the normal flow), I don't think there is a need >> to add a lot of parametrization just to implement this single quirk. >> IMO it can wait for the next one. > > OK, I have pushed patches 1 - 5 to efi/next branch, and the entire > series (with Matt's review feedback regarding #6 and #7 incorporated) > to my own branch here > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=quark-capsule > > Jan, would you mind taking over again, i.e, update patch #8 and repost > patches #6, #7 and #8 after retesting? (just remove my S-o-b from #8 > after you've reworked it)
Sure, I'll pick them up ASAP. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
