On 10/16, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Thanks Jens, > > > > On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect > > the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be > > better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if possible. > > I agree, that's what got us into trouble in the first place. Can I add > your acked-by or review-by to the other patch, then?
I queued the patch in f2fs for -next with SOB, so I guess block for -next should be fine to assume this patch is in. Can I? > > -- > Jens Axboe _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
