On 10/16/18 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 10/16, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 10/16/18 1:23 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> Thanks Jens, >>> >>> On top of the patch killing the dead code, I wrote another one to detect >>> the idle time by the internal account logic like below. IMHO, it'd be >>> better to decouple f2fs with other layers, if possible. >> >> I agree, that's what got us into trouble in the first place. Can I add >> your acked-by or review-by to the other patch, then? > > I queued the patch in f2fs for -next with SOB, so I guess block for -next > should > be fine to assume this patch is in. Can I?
Yes, that's totally fine as well, thanks. -- Jens Axboe _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
