On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:03:01PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Endian-independent code is slower than wrong-endian code, because of the 
> necessary conditionals.  Thus, you DO NOT WANT this(*).

I'd prefer not to have it either.  But a someone (pinhead) was smart
enough not to define an endianess for cramfs from the beginning we're
stuck with it.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to