On Mon, 15 May 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: > > Sure, it has - if it ever comes to ->put_super() you are guaranteed that > there's no active references to the tree left; whatever you have is yours > and "walk the tree doing dput() on every dentry" is perfectly legitimate. > FWIW, I can toss such a function into dcache.c - it's very likely to be > useful for other such animals. Hmm.. What about autofs4? I think it uses the same ramfs method. So yes, it sounds like a common support routine to have. Linus
- VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Petr Vandrovec
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Alexander Viro
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Alexander Viro
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmou... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after u... Alexander Viro
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes aft... Linus Torvalds
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes aft... Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Alexander Viro
- Re: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount... Petr Vandrovec