Hi Kaneko-san,
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2014-11-07 19:51 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> Given we now have 4 identical copies of the above struct gpio_rcar_info,
>>>> I think it starts to make sense to create
>>>>
>>>> static struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen2 = {
>>>> .has_both_edge_trigger = true;
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> and just reference that one from gpio_rcar_of_table[].
>>>> While at it, you can do the same for R-Car Gen 1 for consistency.
>>>
>>> Is the following what you intended?
>>
>> Yes, thank you very much.
>>
>> Please add a similar struct for R-Car Gen1.
>
> I'm not sure about R-Car Gen1.
> Is it the following things?
>
> +static const struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen1 = {
> + .has_both_edge_trigger = false,
> +};
> [...]
> }, {
> .compatible = "renesas,gpio-rcar",
> - .data = (void *)&(const struct gpio_rcar_info) {
> - .has_both_edge_trigger = false,
> - },
> + .data = &gpio_rcar_info_gen1,
> }, {
Yes, that looks fine to me.
Thanks.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
