Hi Geert-san,
2014-11-07 20:24 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>:
> Hi Kaneko-san,
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 2014-11-07 19:51 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>:
>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Yoshihiro Kaneko <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Given we now have 4 identical copies of the above struct gpio_rcar_info,
>>>>> I think it starts to make sense to create
>>>>>
>>>>> static struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen2 = {
>>>>> .has_both_edge_trigger = true;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> and just reference that one from gpio_rcar_of_table[].
>>>>> While at it, you can do the same for R-Car Gen 1 for consistency.
>>>>
>>>> Is the following what you intended?
>>>
>>> Yes, thank you very much.
>>>
>>> Please add a similar struct for R-Car Gen1.
>>
>> I'm not sure about R-Car Gen1.
>> Is it the following things?
>>
>> +static const struct gpio_rcar_info gpio_rcar_info_gen1 = {
>> + .has_both_edge_trigger = false,
>> +};
>> [...]
>> }, {
>> .compatible = "renesas,gpio-rcar",
>> - .data = (void *)&(const struct gpio_rcar_info) {
>> - .has_both_edge_trigger = false,
>> - },
>> + .data = &gpio_rcar_info_gen1,
>> }, {
>
> Yes, that looks fine to me.
Many thanks!
I'll update this patch.
Thanks,
Kaneko
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
> [email protected]
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
> that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
