As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
index 0a01c8736aff..b08b22b1b111 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int tz1090_pdc_gpio_direction_output(struct 
gpio_chip *chip,
 static int tz1090_pdc_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
 {
        struct tz1090_pdc_gpio *priv = to_pdc(chip);
-       return pdc_read(priv, REG_SOC_GPIO_STATUS) & BIT(offset);
+       return !!(pdc_read(priv, REG_SOC_GPIO_STATUS) & BIT(offset));
 }
 
 static void tz1090_pdc_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
-- 
2.4.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to