On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:27:24PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative > error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all > drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1]. > We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern. > > Cc: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com>
Cheers
James
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
> index 0a01c8736aff..b08b22b1b111 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tz1090-pdc.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int tz1090_pdc_gpio_direction_output(struct
> gpio_chip *chip,
> static int tz1090_pdc_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct tz1090_pdc_gpio *priv = to_pdc(chip);
> - return pdc_read(priv, REG_SOC_GPIO_STATUS) & BIT(offset);
> + return !!(pdc_read(priv, REG_SOC_GPIO_STATUS) & BIT(offset));
> }
>
> static void tz1090_pdc_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> --
> 2.4.3
>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
