On 5/29/06, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2006-05-29T06:44:05, Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >Running CTS on 6 nodes has shown MAXMSG to be too small - the PE cannot
> >send its transition graph and the cluster stalls indefinitely.
>
> So, that means the CIB is > 256K compressed? Or is it > 256K uncompressed?
This is about the transition graph, not the CIB, and it's sent via local
IPC only (uncompressed). Compressing local data transfers seems silly.
The problem, as Andrew tells me, is the tons of probes generated for
every resource and every clone right now. (But I anticipate that a
cluster with large number of resources might hit the same problem, even
w/o probes.) Sigh.
As this data is only passed locally, we _could_ pass around a reference
to a file instead.
until we run into the same problem for the CIB...
i'd be more inclined to fix it so that both will work.
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
