On 2007-06-07T15:16:18, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you send over the log for that one. I'm collecting those ;-)
What are you using the logs for?
I can try to find them, I hope I didn't delete them yet.
> > I _think_ the second cheapest path would be to move the compression out
> > of that layer (and either have the CRM compress the payload directly, or
> > directly compress all FT_COMPRESS data on _add, so that the lower levels
> > never see any uncompressed fields).
> It seems that no estimate on message compression is done, but just
> a regular length estimate. Perhaps the requester should also send
> a hint on how well the data is expected to compress. Otherwise,
> the length checking business could be a bit delayed, but that
> could make the code more complex.
Right. That's why the compression needs to be done in the *_add call
directly, so that the lower levels need not know about message
compression.
Hinting is broken by design, and I don't want to see that introduced.
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
