On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 05:48:36PM +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:11:41PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Sun, August 17, 2008 9:14 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > > On 2008-08-16T20:49:03, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Etch doesn't have this package. The binary required, it should be > > >> uuidgen if I'm not wrong, is in e2fsprogs. Don't know how this > > >> should be dealt with. > > > > > > Hm? But debian builds? > > It's an installation requirement. Otherwise, looks like that the > source package remained the same (e2fsprogs) on both stable and > unstable.
Right, silly me. I realised that this morning. > > I should have made it clear that my target for the work that > > I did in debian/ is unstable. > > OK. Didn't know that. > > > If uuid-runtime | uuidgen makes > > Etch happy, I'm happy for that change to go in. > > Hmm, I suppose that it should be uuid-runtime | e2fsprogs, but > then e2fsprogs is available in unstable as well, but without > uuidgen. Bummer. Anyway, it's possible to install the package now > too with --force-depends. Ok, that probably implies that the bug appeared whenever uuid-runtime was split out of e2fsprogs. http://bugs.debian.org/484868 If we want packages that install (without --force-depends) on Etch, then I think that uuid-runtime | e2fsprogs is the best way to go. Though I sense some bizarre Debian policy rule that will end up having me remove it from the Debian packages in sid. _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
