On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 15:52, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, right, that timeout (based on cluster_delay) was provided > only as a hint to stonithd how much the fencing operation should > take. Anyway, please keep sending it (the timeout), because > stonithd falls back on it in case there's no timeout specified > for the start operation. default-action-timeout ensures that every (resource) action has a timeout _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
