On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 15:52, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh, right, that timeout (based on cluster_delay) was provided > > only as a hint to stonithd how much the fencing operation should > > take. Anyway, please keep sending it (the timeout), because > > stonithd falls back on it in case there's no timeout specified > > for the start operation. > > default-action-timeout ensures that every (resource) action has a timeout
OK. In that case the fencing operation will default with that value. At any rate, it is highly recommendable to specify a timeout for your stonith devices/resources. Thanks, Dejan > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
