Hi Dejan, > The change is not difficult, but then we would need to change all > external plugins too. It should've been done so in the first place.
I understood it. Will you adopt this patch till it is changed for processing same as lrmd? I attach a new patch. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:46:33AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > It would also be good to rename "isbufferd" to say "data_call". > > OK. > > > > > That way we state that what is expected from the plugin is data > > > on stdin (getinfo, get_confignames, hostlist). With the other > > > calls (status and reset_req) we expect informational or error > > > messages. > > I think it to change it to structure such as lrmd without using popen. > > (lrmd : fork + exec + pipe(stdout,stdin)) > > > > Is it a difficult change to make same as lrmd? > > The change is not difficult, but then we would need to change all > external plugins too. It should've been done so in the first place. > > Thanks, > > Dejan > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Ymamauchi. > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:50:13AM +0900, [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > > > Sorry.... > > > > Meanings of your comment cannot understand it well. > > > > Please teach contents of the comment a little more intelligibly. > > > > > > Please ignore what I wrote. external_run_cmd uses popen() and the > > > plugins use stdout for informational messages too. Not the best > > > way, but we can live with that. > > > > > > I get the meaning of your patch, but still don't understand the > > > part I quoted in the first reply. > > > > > > It would also be good to rename "isbufferd" to say "data_call". > > > That way we state that what is expected from the plugin is data > > > on stdin (getinfo, get_confignames, hostlist). With the other > > > calls (status and reset_req) we expect informational or error > > > messages. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:34:56PM +0900, [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > We are troubled with log in reset of stonith. > > > > > > > > > > > > Log is not output till practice is completed in the reset movement > > > > > > of stonith. > > > > > > > > > > I see your point. > > > > > > > > > > > The stonith module which is extenal which we made gives log during > > > > > > reset movement and > > > chases > > > > > movement. > > > > > > For us, the chase of the reset movement is very useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > We think that the whole reset movement should be over the log at > > > > > > any time. > > > > > > > > > > The stdout/stderr should be split with stderr going immediately > > > > > to the log and the content of stdout returned to the caller. Any > > > > > chance to implement it that way. > > > > > > > > > > > I created a patch for external.c. > > > > > > Please teach it if there is the revision method that, besides, is > > > > > > good. > > > > > > > > > > After taking a quick look, I find this part a bit strange: > > > > > > > > > > + if (fgets(buff, BUFF_LEN, file)) { > > > > > + LOG(PIL_INFO, "%s: '%s' output: %s", > > > > > __FUNCTION__, cmd, buff); > > > > > + if (Debug && data) { > > > > > + LOG(PIL_DEBUG, "%s: '%s' > > > > > output: %s", __FUNCTION__, cmd, buff); > > > > > + } > > > > > + tosleep = FALSE; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ >
external.patch.1215
Description: 1805390968-external.patch.1215
_______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
