Hi Dejan, > Well, didn't feel like doing it now, but that may be necessary. I've > already got a patch, but then anything a plugin spits on the stdin > (when doing power requests and status) goes to log at the info level > and there's no way around it. For instance, that makes it impossible > for plugins to log at the debug level.
OK. I understand. > I think we should revisit the whole external plugins logging and > simply make them log directly through ha_log. The output by ha_log is surely necessary. However, a revision to use "echo" for by a recent change enters. We must return this change again. Is there any problem in our using ha_log? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hideo-san, > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:20:44AM +0900, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi Dejan, > > > > All right. > > > > >but I'll do something about it. We can track the > > > issue in bugzilla 1972. > > > > Are you to revise it by a policy like lrmd? > > Well, didn't feel like doing it now, but that may be necessary. I've > already got a patch, but then anything a plugin spits on the stdin > (when doing power requests and status) goes to log at the info level > and there's no way around it. For instance, that makes it impossible > for plugins to log at the debug level. > > I think we should revisit the whole external plugins logging and > simply make them log directly through ha_log. > > Cheers, > > Dejan > > > If I can assist your work, please mail to me. > > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:33:08AM +0900, [email protected] > > > wrote: > > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > > > > The change is not difficult, but then we would need to change all > > > > > external plugins too. It should've been done so in the first place. > > > > > > > > I understood it. > > > > Will you adopt this patch till it is changed for processing same as > > > > lrmd? > > > > > > > > I attach a new patch. > > > > > > Thanks for the patch. It's still not clear to me what was your > > > intention in the last part of the patch, which I quoted in the > > > first reply, but I'll do something about it. We can track the > > > issue in bugzilla 1972. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:46:33AM +0900, [email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would also be good to rename "isbufferd" to say "data_call". > > > > > > OK. > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way we state that what is expected from the plugin is data > > > > > > > on stdin (getinfo, get_confignames, hostlist). With the other > > > > > > > calls (status and reset_req) we expect informational or error > > > > > > > messages. > > > > > > I think it to change it to structure such as lrmd without using > > > > > > popen. > > > > > > (lrmd : fork + exec + pipe(stdout,stdin)) > > > > > > > > > > > > Is it a difficult change to make same as lrmd? > > > > > > > > > > The change is not difficult, but then we would need to change all > > > > > external plugins too. It should've been done so in the first place. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Hideo Ymamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:50:13AM +0900, > > > > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dejan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry.... > > > > > > > > Meanings of your comment cannot understand it well. > > > > > > > > Please teach contents of the comment a little more intelligibly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please ignore what I wrote. external_run_cmd uses popen() and the > > > > > > > plugins use stdout for informational messages too. Not the best > > > > > > > way, but we can live with that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I get the meaning of your patch, but still don't understand the > > > > > > > part I quoted in the first reply. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It would also be good to rename "isbufferd" to say "data_call". > > > > > > > That way we state that what is expected from the plugin is data > > > > > > > on stdin (getinfo, get_confignames, hostlist). With the other > > > > > > > calls (status and reset_req) we expect informational or error > > > > > > > messages. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Dejan Muhamedagic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Hideo-san, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 05:34:56PM +0900, > > > > > > > > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are troubled with log in reset of stonith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Log is not output till practice is completed in the reset > > > > > > > > > > movement of stonith. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I see your point. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The stonith module which is extenal which we made gives log > > > > > > > > > > during reset > movement > > > and > > > > > > > chases > > > > > > > > > movement. > > > > > > > > > > For us, the chase of the reset movement is very useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We think that the whole reset movement should be over the > > > > > > > > > > log at any time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The stdout/stderr should be split with stderr going > > > > > > > > > immediately > > > > > > > > > to the log and the content of stdout returned to the caller. > > > > > > > > > Any > > > > > > > > > chance to implement it that way. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I created a patch for external.c. > > > > > > > > > > Please teach it if there is the revision method that, > > > > > > > > > > besides, is good. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After taking a quick look, I find this part a bit strange: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (fgets(buff, BUFF_LEN, file)) { > > > > > > > > > + LOG(PIL_INFO, "%s: '%s' output: > > > > > > > > > %s", __FUNCTION__, cmd, buff); > > > > > > > > > + if (Debug && data) { > > > > > > > > > + LOG(PIL_DEBUG, "%s: > > > > > > > > > '%s' output: %s", __FUNCTION__, cmd, buff); > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > + tosleep = FALSE; > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dejan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > > > Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] > > > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > === 以下のメッセージは省略されました === _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
