Hi Serge, > I know about that issue. The easy fix would be to all a sleep command > just after > > runasowner "$OCF_RESKEY_pgctl $pgctl_options start" > > So it'll look like: > > # Invoke pg_ctl > runasowner "$OCF_RESKEY_pgctl $pgctl_options start" > > if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > # Probably started..... > ocf_log info "PostgreSQL start command sent." > else > ocf_log err "Can't start PostgreSQL." > return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC > fi > > sleep 2 > > while : > do
I do not think that sleep of two seconds can wait for start of postgres surely. I think that we change by environment and the situation of the load of the CPU in time that start of postgres takes. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Serge Dubrouski <serge...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 8:26 PM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > > Hi Serge, > > > > Thank you for comment. > > > >> Do you think that changing that "ocf_log $loglevel" to "ocf_log err" > >> will be better? > > > > > > Is your opinion the next change? > > > > (snip) > >        elif [ $rc -eq 2 ]; then > >            ocf_log err "Connection error > > (connection to the server went bad and the ---> > > $loglevel->err this??? > > Yes. > > > > > (snip) > > > > By the start handling of pgsql, the monitor processing does not succeed > > immediately. > > It is recorded in log by an error to success when we perform this change. > > > > After all this confuses an operator. > > I know about that issue. The easy fix would be to all a sleep command > just after > > runasowner "$OCF_RESKEY_pgctl $pgctl_options start" > > So it'll look like: > > # Invoke pg_ctl > runasowner "$OCF_RESKEY_pgctl $pgctl_options start" > > if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then > # Probably started..... > ocf_log info "PostgreSQL start command sent." > else > ocf_log err "Can't start PostgreSQL." > return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC > fi > > sleep 2 > > while : > do > > > > > However, it is considerably troublesome to let ocf_run support loglevel. > > > > I think a little more, too. > > > > Best Regards, > > Hideo Yamauchi. > > > > > > --- Serge Dubrouski <serge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Do you think that changing that "ocf_log $loglevel" to "ocf_log err" > >> will be better? > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 12:48 AM,  <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > >> > Hi Serge, > >> > > >> > When we use ocf_run in some pgsql, a problem is left. > >> > > >> > In ocf_run, ocf_run outputs log as an error in the case of 2 the > >> > practice result of the > >> command. > >> > > >> > ocf_run() { > >> > (snip) > >> >        else > >> >            if [ ! -z "$output" ]; then > >> >                ocf_log err > >> > "$output" > >> >            else > >> >                ocf_log err > >> > "command failed: $*" > >> >            fi > >> >            return $rc > >> >        fi > >> > } > >> > > >> > But, in pgsql side, the log is output by an error or warning in the case > >> > of 2 the practice > >> result of > >> > the command by a loglevel variable. > >> > > >> > > >> > pgsql_monitor() { > >> >    local loglevel > >> > (snip) > >> >    runasowner -q "$OCF_RESKEY_psql $psql_options -c 'select > >> > now();'" > >> > > >> >    rc=$? > >> >    if [ $rc -ne  0 ]; then > >> >        ocf_log $loglevel "PostgreSQL > >> > $OCF_RESKEY_pgdb isn't running" > >> >        if [ $rc -eq 1 ]; then > >> >            ocf_log err "Fatal error (out > >> > of memory, file not > found, > > etc.) occurred while > >> executing > >> > the psql command." > >> >        elif [ $rc -eq 2 ]; then > >> >            ocf_log $loglevel "Connection > >> > error (connection to > the > > server went bad and the > >> session was > >> > not interactive) occurred while executing the psql command." > >> >        elif [ $rc -eq 3 ]; then > >> >            ocf_log err "Script error (the > >> > variable > ON_ERROR_STOP was > > set) occurred while > >> executing > >> > the psql command." > >> >        fi > >> >        return $OCF_ERR_GENERIC > >> >    fi > >> > (snip) > >> > > >> > This difference confuses an operator. > >> > > >> > Best Regards, > >> > Hideo Yamauchi. > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________________ > >> > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > >> > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > >> > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Serge Dubrouski. > >> _______________________________________________________ > >> Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > >> Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > >> > > > > _______________________________________________________ > > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > > > > > > -- > Serge Dubrouski. > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ > _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/