Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:08:47AM -0400, Michael Smith wrote: >> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:55:26PM -0400, Michael Smith wrote: >>>> From: Xinwei Hu <x...@novell.com> >>>> >>>> We prefer to activate the mirrored LV is in the degraded mode, >>>> rather then failing to activate it at all. >>> What are the possible consequences of using --partial to activate >>> a volume group? >> As I understand it, --partial will allow a mirrored volume group to be >> activated if some of the mirror drives are missing. >> >> It will also allow a group to be activated in read-only mode if drives >> (and data) are missing. So perhaps this --partial should be conditional on >> a parameter. > > Yes, I'd really prefer that. It looks like a substantial > semantical change to me. The man page says:
I think you and Xinwei both work for Novell/SUSE, right? Maybe you can sort it out amongst yourselves. The patch is in SLES. I don't actually need it, I just figured somebody should get it upstream. Mike _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
