Hi, On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 02:11:03PM -0400, Michael Smith wrote: > Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 08:08:47AM -0400, Michael Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:55:26PM -0400, Michael Smith wrote: > >>>> From: Xinwei Hu <x...@novell.com> > >>>> > >>>> We prefer to activate the mirrored LV is in the degraded mode, > >>>> rather then failing to activate it at all. > >>> What are the possible consequences of using --partial to activate > >>> a volume group? > >> As I understand it, --partial will allow a mirrored volume group to be > >> activated if some of the mirror drives are missing. > >> > >> It will also allow a group to be activated in read-only mode if drives > >> (and data) are missing. So perhaps this --partial should be conditional on > >> a parameter. > > > > Yes, I'd really prefer that. It looks like a substantial > > semantical change to me. The man page says: > > I think you and Xinwei both work for Novell/SUSE, right? Maybe you can > sort it out amongst yourselves. The patch is in SLES. I don't actually > need it, I just figured somebody should get it upstream.
Well, it's the other way around, this is the right place to sort things like this out :) Thanks, Dejan > Mike > _______________________________________________________ > Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev > Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/ _______________________________________________________ Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
