On 2011-02-09T18:08:51, Holger Teutsch <holger.teut...@web.de> wrote:
> coming back from a 3 hour break I'm a bit shocked about the very
> *active* discussion and it is difficult to me to find an entry point.
Heh ;-) Sorry, you've prodded a wasp nest.
> I've spent a lot of time to make it plug in compatible to the old agent.
> I was the one who contributed the last patches to the old agent so I know it
> pretty well.
[snip]
What you describe here with regard to the manual testing you've done
clearly convinces me that the new RA is as good as the old one.
(As you can probably tell, I'm not a big fan of the idea of shipping
both.)
> If you have some formal requirements for documentation please feel free
> to forward them to me.
We don't have them _yet_, which I think is holding us up here.
I'm wondering if you could automate these tests in a script (perhaps
using the ocft framework that is in the repo)? So that we can show that
the "new" DB2 one passes them just as well as the legacy one?
(Actually, I'd expect the new one to pass more than the old one, since
it covers additional scenarios.)
It may be a bit too much to ask, but hey, there's lunch ;-) And I won't
be too cheap.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
