On 2011-03-23T11:50:02, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenb...@linbit.com> wrote:
> > # Take advantage of /etc/mtab if present, use portable mount command
> > # otherwise. Normalize format to "dev mountpoint fstype".
I wonder if we shouldn't just always rely on "mount" and insist on that
providing proper data.
Re-implementing mount seems like a bad idea. If more extensive checks
than a binary "mounted xor not" are needed, this would be noticed by the
deeper monitor levels or the application-level monitor, no?
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
