On 2011-03-23T14:45:50, Corvus Corax <e...@lightwerk.com> wrote:
> > Re-implementing mount seems like a bad idea. If more extensive checks
> > than a binary "mounted xor not" are needed, this would be noticed by the
> > deeper monitor levels or the application-level monitor, no?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lars
> >
> I had a weird case in which a filesystem (GFS2) had gotten unmounted
> without /etc/mtab being modified.
I can see that happen, but the application-level monitoring would still
catch that.
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA, OPS Engineering, Novell, Inc.
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________________
Linux-HA-Dev: Linux-HA-Dev@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha-dev
Home Page: http://linux-ha.org/
