On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> > On 5/31/07, Jan Kalcic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> >> > please update to the latest version available from suse via the
>> update
>> >> > service
>> >> >
>> >> On SLES 10 updated I don't have the problem mentioned here but I
>> can't
>> >> generate a cib.xml which works correctly for me. The cib.xml
>> generated
>> >> from the same haresources file by a guy here looks much different and
>> >> works properly.
>> >
>> > from the same version?
>> >
>> > define "doesnt work"?
>> >
>>
>> His version was 2.0.8. Mine was 2.0.7-1.2. No idea about his OS but I
>
> different versions produced different output? gee, i'm shocked.
>
Maybe you forgot what the topic is.
No, I've not forgotten.
But you're wasting my time and that annoy me.
I don't have all day to pry relevant information out of people.
"it works for him but not me", yet you didn't think to mention the
version difference?
Thats pretty relevant don't you think? Especially since it means the
problem, whatever it was, is clearly already resolved and all you need
to do is upgrade (or follow Dejan's advice at the time which was
almost certainly correct).
If you want vendor support for older versions then you need to go via
the proper channels, and community mailing lists ain't one of them.
The lesson people, is that you're not going to get a response if you
don't give enough information on which to do so. And there is no
excuse for not knowing what to send because its at the bottom of every
single email sent to the list:
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
We are not talking about the output
produced between different versions which is quite obvious it is
different. Here the problem is that the haresources2cib.py provided with
SLES10, and with its updates too, doesn't generate a correct cib.xml.
Unfortunately I don't longer have the environment to reproduce the
problem to give you more information. When I had I did but at that time
you were not interested in perhaps.
>> don't think it matters. The topic started here:
>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2007-April/024894.html
>>
>> I can't tell you that the cib.xml file I generated was shorter compared
>> to the one which worked. Some lines were missing but not being an expert
>> at all I can't tell you exactly where was the problem. Actually I've
>> given up for a while with crm and at the moment I'm using old fashioned
>> haresources file which is much easier for new heartbeat-guys like me and
>> enough powerful for simple scenarios.
>>
>> Hope this help.
>
> i'm not sure how since you've still not described _anywhere_ what
> "doesn't work" means. you've also provided no logs. did you try
> crm_verify at all?
As above, I could but now I can't give you more information.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
