Hi

I did some tests on score calculation as I could not find a good web resource on this. Now I would like to get this confirmed or corrected.

Suppose I have a resource with a resource location constraint wit score 300 for node A, score 250 for node B, resource stickiness = 200, failure stickiness = -100.

Startup. Resource goes to node A with score 300, gets the stickiness addition and scores end up with A=500, B=250

Now say the monitor action on the resource reports an error. Failcount on A is increased, scores are recalculated. Is the following correct?:

score + stickiness + (failcount*failurestickiness) = actualscore
So in my exmaple
300+200+(1*(-100))=400

This would make it A=400, B=250, so the resource would get stop/started on A, no more calculation is done. Correct?

Another question:
Back to the top first, A=500, B=250, Resource running on A. All failcounts=0.

Now say the monitor action reports the resource is not running. Failcount on A is increased and scores are recalculated. Is the following difference (to the first calculation) correct?

score+(failcount*failurestickiness)=actualscore
So in my example
300+(1*(-100))=200

So A=200, B=250, Resource gets stop on A, start on B. *Afterwards*, B gets the stickiness Bonus of +200, so it ends up with
A=200, B=450.
Is this correct?

Is there any website that describes these calculations?

Regards
Dominik
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to