Yes I meant the resource is running first and crashes later on, so that
monitor reports "not running".
generally, one shouldn't report "not running" in such cases
Okay, maybe I should have read this more precisely.
http://www.linux-ha.org/OCFResourceAgent
"monitor - monitor the health of a resource. Exit 0 if the resource is
running, 7 if it is stopped and anything else if it is failed"
Okay. Good to know. But how can I (my RA) know wether Linux-HA expects
my resource to run or not to run when it calls the monitor script?
Iirc it calls "monitor" on probe and on monitor action. Is there a way
to determine what it expects to get? Because the way I understand it
now, I have to return OCF_NOT_RUNNING in case "monitor" is called by
probe and the resource is not runnning and return OCF_ERR_GENERIC (or
some other non-0 and non-7 value) if "monitor" is called by monitor and
the resource is not running.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
