Andrew Beekhof a écrit :
On Jan 24, 2008, at 10:20 AM, GAUTIER Hervé wrote:
Hi there !
As Sylvain, I don't understand how HeartBeat (and in particular
PaceMaker) ensure high availability of a service (application
resource) if it is not possible to configure automatic failover in
case of resource failure needed by the service ?
It _does_ do automatic failover.
What it wont do is move to a node where the resource has _already_
failed.
That's my point.
Soon we will be able to do even better than this by using the new LRM
timing data to expire failures automagically (thus allowing a resource
that fails for a second or third time to return to the original node
after a configured interval)
Ok, thank for the information.
If I understand well, the fail-count counter will be reset automagically ?
--
Hervé GAUTIER
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
