On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:53:05PM +0100, Andreas Mock wrote: > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von > > Andrew Beekhof > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 15:08 > > An: General Linux-HA mailing list > > > 4) Who is fiddling with sheebang paths? (Can I assume LSB > > compliance?) > > > > sheebang? > > I wrote it wrong: shebang > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shebang_(Unix)
#! you mean > > > 5) Where do I have to document other dependencies, e.g. certain > > > interpreter? > > > > me no comprehendo > > Sorry, my English. > If I write a RA in e.g. python, than python has to be installed > additionally to RA itself. I don't pack the RA into the RA-package, > but the packager has to know about this dependency. > > So, I tried to ask where to document this dependency if I'm only the > RA developer but not a rpm/deb packager. That's all. :-)) Just put it in the meta-data of the RA. If the RA is going to be packaged with heartbeat, then we may put that dependency in the rpm/deb specfiles. Cheers, Dejan > Cheers > Andreas Mock > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
